Wednesday, July 8, 2020
Horror and Reality The Artillerymans Contribution to the Novel - Literature Essay Samples
During Book Two, Chapter Seven of The War of the Worlds, we are reminded of the artillerymanââ¬â¢s eccentric character. In short, his role is as an object of satire: he voices opinions for Wells to criticise. Nonetheless, the artilleryman does more than this; he gives a horrifying image of how humans will evolve, which can be applied to the real world that Wells was actually writing about. The artilleryman shows one view Wells is against in his manner of thinking. He is very much obsessed with possession, as evidenced by his bold claim, ââ¬Ëthis is my country.ââ¬â¢ This kind of parochial view is exactly what Wells is trying to eliminate through writing this book. Wells uses this phrase to bring colonial thoughts to the readerââ¬â¢s mind, but ensures we still view these ââ¬Ënavy-crowded seasââ¬â¢ in a negative light through the narratorââ¬â¢s disinterested response. He seems unenthusiastic and gives the artilleryman short answers, even though the artilleryman speaks incessantly, sometimes for entire paragraphs. The artilleryman then continues by telling the narrator that ââ¬Ëthere is only food for oneââ¬â¢, which emphasizes his selfishness. However, as previously mentioned, the artilleryman is more than just an object of satire. He also holds some views which the narrator completely agrees with. One example of this is his contempt for the deeply class-ridden Victorian society. He says ââ¬Ëif youââ¬â¢ve got any drawing room manners, or dislike eating peas with a knifeâ⬠¦ you better chuck ââ¬Ëem away. They ainââ¬â¢t no further use.ââ¬â¢ He has made it perfectly clear: classes and drawing-room manners wonââ¬â¢t be needed in a post-apocalyptic world. This view is one that Wells agrees with because it suggests that these classes, if not needed in The War of the Worlds, are not needed in the real world either. Wells goes so far to emphasize the narrator and the artilleryman sharing common ground that he even has the artilleryman use the narratorââ¬â¢s ant analogy from Book One. Much of this has probably been put in place to give the reader a good reason for why the narrator accepted the artillerymanââ¬â¢s ideas in the first place, and then helped him in the task of building a redundant tunnel. The narrator accepts the artillerymanââ¬â¢s insane philosophy at first because they do have so much in common. The artilleryman gives the horrifying image of humans as some sort of cattle for the Martians, living in ââ¬Ëroomy cagesââ¬â¢ with ââ¬Ëfattening foodââ¬â¢, except for a strong race of men and women who will live freely beyond Martian rule. The artilleryman includes himself and the narrator in this group, which clearly appeals to the narratorââ¬â¢s vanity, and so he decides to help the artilleryman. It is important to note here that we cannot assume Wellsââ¬â¢ beliefs are identical to the narratorââ¬â¢s. We know in several instances they differ greatly, for example the narrator prays to God believing He will take action to change the world, but Wellsââ¬â¢ beliefs about God (from God the Invisible King) are that ââ¬ËGod does not guide our feetââ¬â¢ and He will not do anything to change the natural course of nature. The narratorââ¬â¢s selfishness in accepting the artillerymanââ¬â¢s views is another example of when Wellsââ¬â¢ views differ from the narratorââ¬â¢s, because, as an egalitarian, Wells would not have believed it right for some people to life as cattle whilst other were living in freedom. Wells shows his disapproval of this by allowing the narrator to become disillusioned, through the artillerymanââ¬â¢s laziness and inability to complete a task. He tells the narrator: ââ¬ËOh, one canââ¬â¢t always work.ââ¬â¢ This is the exact moment that the narrator says he ââ¬Ësaw the man plainââ¬â¢, which proves it is the artillerymanââ¬â¢s lazy character that gives him away. It gives him away as being insane, which is in no way unknown to the reader. Of course, if the man is thought of as insane, no reader will listen to his ideas because society thinks of insanity as something that makes you think in the wrong way, and is good cause for locking you up away from everyone else. Hence Wells has exposed the artillerymanââ¬â¢s views as incorrect. One final idea the artilleryman contributes to the novel is the criticism he puts forward of human nature. He says the human race deserves their fate under the Martians because people have led their lives in fear rather than freedom, which has made them easy prey; he also raises Darwinian ideas of survival of the fittest. Ultimately, the artilleryman indicates that the ones who survive will be the ones who are prepared to reject societyââ¬â¢s values. This scenario shows Wellsââ¬â¢ dislike of societyââ¬â¢s values in his own time, such as the inequality of the class system. Wells isnââ¬â¢t only arguing that the class system is wrong, but that we wonââ¬â¢t be able to survive unless we eliminate it.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.